evaluation of shoots

Before we actually shot our footage we went on some location reccies and shoot walkthroughs, this enabled us to plan the exact shot and shot size which we needed for the actual shoot. It was also useful because it showed us what problems we were likely to face when doing the actual shoot, one of these problems was the amount of people that were around and we did encounter some problems with this when doing the actual shoot.

Our first shoot wasn't very successful because we filmed it early in the morning so the lighting wasn't very good. Also, we were filming outside a train station and this made it difficult to shoot the longer shots because it was busy with commuters. Furthermore, it was raining when we performed the shoot which lowered the quality of the footage.

Our second shoot was more successful because the weather was better and we filmed later in the day which meant that the streets were not as busy as before. Also, the shots themselves were of a higher quality because we used a tripod which made the camera a lot more steady than in the first shoot.

Our third shoot was successful because we managed to film a lot of footage because the location wasn't very busy. Also, the lighting for the close-up leg shots was better than on the second shoot because the sunlight wasn't as strong so the throusers weren't as bright and the shot looked better.

Our fourth shoot was a re-shoot of the first shoot, it was successful because we achieved what we needed to in that the lighting was better in the re-shoot and we got the camera angles right. In the fourth shoot we also filmed the opening sequence of the music video which was going to be difficult because we needed to use a strobe light to give the feeling of the end of a party. These shots were difficult because the camera had trouble registering the facial details of the actors, we got round this by using phone lights to slightly light up their faces. Also, the camera had trouble focusing because of the flashing of the strobe light, we overcame this problem by slowing down the flashing of the strobe light.

Our final shoot was successful because we found a few new locations which would fit in with the opening sequences. Also, the new footage which we got will help to give the video a sense of a journey.

Overall, our shoots were relatively successful because we only had to re-shoot two sequences and the rest of the footage we successfully shot first time.

editing progress

So far with editing we have come across some problems, these being; firstly the first day of shooting was to dark as we filmed early in the morning. This also had the problem of it raining so when we came to edit the footage it was bad quality and needed to be re-shot. So when we re-shot this footage we did it later in the day and used to the editing software to turn the contrast down and make it look darker than it was. This effect worked but we had to play with the settings so that it looked the same as clips from out original shoot.
After uploading out footage onto the editing software we deleted useless footage and then placed the footage we had in a time order. We decided that placing some transaction between the clips would make it easier when we came to finalising the footage at the end. Some shots we had difficulties editing were the time-lapse shots, we did not realise that we had to have a shot of the empty ally so when the we faded out one clip using the opacity tool the other clip could be faded in. To overcome this we cross faded two shots so when one faded out the other faded in, giving the same effect with what shots we had, saving us having to film more footage.
Other problems we are having is making sure the each shot is not to long as otherwise it will become boring to the viewer, to make sure this didn’t happen we used lots of quick cuts which should be in time with the beats of our track.
Looking further into our editing we were having problems with our strobe, this is a problem as the lighting conditions were slightly different as the cameras would not pick up enough light. To overcome this we turned on a light but as the shots became lighter the strobe didn’t show up on the characters faces, we turned the contrast down but this didn’t help very much. So through the editing we used quick cuts to get between light shots, this has worked out but is still slightly different from our plan.
We realised that just cutting between each shot made the video boring, to overcome this we used dissolves and fades to cut between shots. The fades that we used were the fade to black and then back to a shot. This worked well as it fits in with the music but also allows you to change backgrounds without making it to obvious. Dissolving shots meant that long shots can be cut down allowing the same background to be there but the character moving from one place to the other. This also worked really well as we had a static camera when filming these shots.

Evaluation of Storyboard and Animatic

In order to successfully put together our animatic, we filmed each shot in our storyboard for around 5 seconds. We then loaded the footage onto a computer and loaded the soundtrack onto it. We then cut the shots down in order to make them fit where they were meant to go in the narrative. We then edited the shots to fit them into time with the track.

The storyboard and the animatic will be useful to us in the filming of our music video because we will be able to plan each shoot and know what the actor(s) will need to do in time with the track. The storyboard will be especially useful in this because we will be able to take it to each shoot and use it to perform each shot with the correct camera movement, shot size and shot length.

The animatic will be useful because it will help us to edit the footage in time with the track. While editing the footage, we will be able to compare it to the animatic and time it to where it is meant to go in the music video.